http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/ Venture Capital Blog :: So to Speak Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:34:33 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3612 web design Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:29:24 +0000 http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/#comment-3612 Good point. To me, Web 2.0 is more of a technology standard. For example, a web site that is easy to navigate and clean to understand. It shouldn't mean the design has to look identical to youtube =] Good point. To me, Web 2.0 is more of a technology standard. For example, a web site that is easy to navigate and clean to understand. It shouldn't mean the design has to look identical to youtube =]

]]> http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/comment-page-1/#comment-3444 web design Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:29:24 +0000 http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/#comment-3444 Good point. To me, Web 2.0 is more of a technology standard. For example, a web site that is easy to navigate and clean to understand. It shouldn't mean the design has to look identical to youtube =] Good point. To me, Web 2.0 is more of a technology standard. For example, a web site that is easy to navigate and clean to understand. It shouldn't mean the design has to look identical to youtube =]

]]> http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/comment-page-1/#comment-472 web design Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:29:24 +0000 http://www.vcfreak.com/should-you-destroy-the-web-20-look/#comment-472 Good point. To me, Web 2.0 is more of a technology standard. For example, a web site that is easy to navigate and clean to understand. It shouldn't mean the design has to look identical to youtube =] Good point. To me, Web 2.0 is more of a technology standard. For example, a web site that is easy to navigate and clean to understand. It shouldn't mean the design has to look identical to youtube =]

]]>